The Sea to Summit Lightweight Dry Bag offers peace of mind and reliable protection.
This dry bag is of a 70D Nylon, PFC-free construction with a PU coating that boasts a 2000mm Hydrostatic Head (HH). The HH is a measure of water resistance – and in this case specifically, the water pressure the bag can withstand before submitting to leakage. The interior white PU-coating allows a reflective panel for easy identification in lowlight conditions – so you can locate that trusty torch in the first place!
Field repair buckles keep close to the sides of the bag for a better seal, and a reinforced construction on all stress points ensures rugged durability from the kayak to the hike track. An oval shape allows a snug fit into any storage space, encouraged too by the non-wicking roll-top closure for a naturally rounded top, ultimate tackle security, and moisture management.
The Lightweight Dry Bag by Sea to Summit is the bag for the kayak cabin and the sack for the hike pack.
70D Nylon construction
PU coating with 2000mm Hydrostatic Head
PFC-free
Bluesign approved main body material
D-ring attachment on buckle
White PU-coated interior for reflectiveness in lowlight
Oval base for easy packing
Roll-top closure for tight, secure closure
Reinforced stitching for durability
Field repair buckles for superior seal
Stiffener strip
Non-wicking closure for moisture control
Sustainably-sourced packaging
External Dimensions:
14.1L x 10.7W x 19H cm
Weight:
0.034 Kg
Capacity:
1.5 L
Material:
bluesign® APPROVED Recycled 70D PU Coated Nylon | Hypalon Rubber | 15 mm (2−Pin) Field−Repair Buckle | PFC−Free
Waterhead Rating:
2000 mm
Warranty:
Limited Lifetime
Supplier Code:
ASG012011-011602
Snowys Code:
49013
Staff tip:Hello hikers, bikers, and kayakers − we should probably mention that despite the bag's impressive water resistance, it's recommended that cameras, phones, and/or other delicate items are kept within an additional protective layer.
Reviews
(1)
5.01
Q&A's (1)
Lightweight v Ultra-sil for food storage1 answer
Just wondering if the lightweight is a better option than ultra-sil for food storage to keep critters away? Is the 70D Nylon likely to be more effective at containing food odours than the 30D dry-sil?
Kristi - Moss Vale, NSW(1 month ago)
G'day Kristi,
They'll both pretty much do the same job. The decision would largely come down to wether or not weight is a consideration. There are many hikers who use ultrasil or dyneema dry sacks for food storage on longer multi day hikes, without issues. Generally the ultra-light materials tend to have a shorter life span than a more heavy duty material, especially if they're getting frequent use, but you'd still get a fair amount of time out of them.